Summary

Ultrasound to identify joint effusions is widely used to assess those children presenting with a limp, refusal to weight bear or with a painful or swollen joint. PoCUS can be used to rapidly evaluate these children at the bedside thereby expediting management. This may include early referral to orthopedics. The use of PoCUS has also been shown to improve the ability of physicians performing arthrocentesis on joint effusions. PoCUS improves accuracy and decreases patient pain, without increasing the length of time required to perform the procedure [11,12].

Pitfalls

In all joints, it is important to assess both the affected joint, and the contralateral side, as a small amount of fluid within the spaces can be normal. In addition, cartilage can appear hypoechoic within these spaces, but will be non-compressible [1]. Finally, fluid within an effusion can be simple (anechoic) or complex (heterogenous in echogenicity) depending on what caused the effusion. Examples of potential complex effusions include hemarthrosis with clots or loculated septic arthritis [1, 3]. Synovitis can mimic a complex effusion, but can be differentiated with the addition of color to look for low grade venous flow.

Ankle Anatomy Review

The area where an effusion in the ankle collects is at the intersection of the tibia and the talus (Figure 15). There is a fat pad (the anterior fat pad) at the junction of these two bones. Superficial to the boney surfaces, the tibialis anterior tendon is found.

Figure 15: Anatomy of the ankle joint.

 

Technique

• Position the patient supine.
• Have the patient flex their knee and place their foot on the bed to place their ankle in dorsiflexion [1].
• Place the linear array probe along the longitudinal axis of the tibia at the joint line between the tibia and talus [1] (Figure 16).

Figure 16: Probe position for ankle ultrasound.

• Identify synovial space at the junction of the talus and the tibia.
• Assess for presence of joint effusion.
• Repeat on the contralateral joint.

 

What am I looking at?

Figure 17: Labelled normal ankle ultrasound. Note that physiologic fluid and cartilage can appear similarly, so differentiate them with compression of the structures. Fluid will compress, cartilage will not.

 

Tibia

• Hyperechoic line cephalad.

Talus

• Hyperechoic line caudal.

Tibialis anterior tendon

• Fibrillar hyperechoic structure in near field.

Anterior fat pad

• Immediately superficial to the synovial space.

Anterior talotibial recess or synovial space

• Superficial to the bony surfaces of the joint.

 

What is normal?

On ultrasound of the ankle, you will see the tibia extending cephalad and the joint line between the tibia and the talus (Video 4). Within the joint space, near field to the bony structures, there may be a small amount of physiologic fluid, and an anterior fat pad. As in the other joints, physiologic fluid will follow the contours of the bone, and have a more concave appearance (Figure 18).

Video 4: Normal ankle ultrasound.

Figure 18: Normal ankle ultrasound.

 

What is NOT normal?

An ankle effusion is characterized by a convex shaped hypoechoic fluid collection anterior to the tibial and talar joint (Figure 19). In the ankle, unlike in the hip, there is no specific measurement for a positive effusion – the important feature to look for is the convexity of the collection (Video 5).

Figure 19: Positive ankle effusion.

Video 5: Ankle joint effusion. Again, note the convex appearance of the fluid.

Knee Anatomy Review

The knee is made up of the articulating surfaces of the femur and the tibia, with the patella lying anteriorly. The quadriceps tendon inserts on the patella, and the patellar tendon extends distally to the tibial tuberosity. The fluid within the synovial capsule is continuous with the suprapatellar bursa. The fat pads found within the knee joint include the quadriceps fat pad and the pre-femoral fat pad (Figure 10).

Figure 10: Anatomy of the knee joint. 

 

Technique

• Position the patient supine.
• Use a towel roll to place the affected knee in 20-30 degrees of flexion [1] (Figure 11).

Figure 11: Probe position for knee ultrasound

• Place the linear array probe longitudinally in the sagittal plane on the patella [10].
• Identify the patella and scan proximally to assess for effusion within the suprapatellar recess [10].
• Assess for presence of joint effusion.
• Repeat on the contralateral joint.

 

What am I looking at?

Figure 12: Labelled normal knee ultrasound.

Patella

• Hyperechoic line in caudal field of view.

Femur

• Hyperechoic line in cephalad field of view.

Quadriceps tendon

• Hyperechoic fibrillar structure in near field.

Fat Pads

• Pre-femoral fat pad – hyperechoic soft tissue collection just anterior to femur.

Quadriceps fat pad – hyperechoic soft tissue collection just inferior to quadriceps tendon.

Suprapatellar bursa

• Hypoechoic potential space.

Prepatellar bursa

• Hypoechoic area superficial to patella.

 

What is normal?

Visualization of the knee joint in this view will show you the patella caudally and the femur extended cranially (Video 2). The quadriceps tendon will be a fibrous structure running in the near field (Figure 13).  The suprapatellar bursa should be less than 2mm thick [1].

Video 2: Normal knee ultrasound.

Figure 13: Normal right and left knee ultrasound. 

 

What is NOT normal?

Fluid will collect in the suprapatellar bursa, found in between the prefemoral and quadriceps fat pads (Video 3). The ultrasound is positive for a knee effusion by a collection of hypoechoic fluid which is >2mm thick [1] (Figure 14). If you are not seeing any fluid collection, flexion of the knee can increase the fluid in the suprapatellar recess [13]. In addition, fluid can collect on both the medial and lateral side of the suprapatellar region, therefore scanning these areas can help identify fluid collections. To do this, slide the probe laterally and medially within the sagittal plane to identify hypoechoic fluid collections.  This can help with performing ultrasound guided arthroscopy of the knee, although that is outside the scope of this module.

Video 3: Knee joint effusion. Note the fluid collection between the quadriceps fat pad and quadriceps tendon superiorly and the prefemoral fat pad inferiorly.   

Figure 14: Positive knee effusion.  

Hip Anatomy Review

The hip joint is a ball and socket joint, comprised of the femoral head and neck and the acetabulum (made up of the ischium, pubis and ilium). The joint capsule surrounds these structures and contains synovial fluid (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Anatomy of the hip joint

 

Superficial to the bony structures, we find the musculature of the pelvis and the hip. Those that are relevant to us for the purpose of scanning for hip effusions include the iliopsoas, quadriceps and sartorius. These muscles are found superficial to the joint (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Hip musculature

Technique

• Position the patient supine, with the affected hip in a neutral position [4].
• Place the linear array probe below the femoral crease, with the probe at a 45-degree angle and pointing posteriorly on the patient: parallel to the neck of the femur (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Probe position for hip ultrasound

• Identify the femoral neck, femoral head, iliopsoas and synovial space in between [7].
• Assess for presence of joint effusion.
• Repeat on the contralateral joint.

 

What am I looking at?

Figure 7: Labelled normal hip ultrasound.

Femoral neck

• Hyperechoic horizontal line.

Femoral head

• Curved hyperechoic line.
• Physis or growth plate can be seen as a notch or hypoechoic break in the femoral head [7].

Muscles

• Iliopsoas muscle is superficial to the synovial space.
• Quadriceps and sartorius are the most superficial structures in the field of view.

Synovial space

• Space between the femoral neck and the iliopsoas muscle.

 

What is normal?

Normally, synovial fluid will follow the contours of the joint itself, in this case, the femoral head and neck. The size of a fluid collection in the hip is measured from the anterior surface of the femoral neck to the posterior surface of the iliopsoas muscle [4]. The space should be <5mm and within 2mm in comparison to the unaffected hip (Figure 8).

Figure 8: Normal hip ultrasound.

 

What is NOT normal?

The presence of a joint effusion in a hip is defined as a space between the anterior surface of the femoral neck to the posterior surface of the iliopsoas muscle of >5mm or >2mm difference in comparison to the unaffected side (Figure 9). An effusion will classically have a convex appearance (Video 1) in comparison to the normal concave appearance of the synovial fluid in a joint without an effusion.

Figure 9: Positive hip effusion.

Video 1: Hip joint effusion. Note the convex appearance of the fluid on the image on the right.

 

 

Sonoanatomy Review

Normal skin and soft tissue have many layers (Figure 1). The most superficial structures are the epidermis and dermis, which appear as if one hyperechoic structure. Deep to this, you will find subcutaneous fat, which is hypoechoic and globular. Blood vessels, nerves and lymph nodes are found within the hypodermis, and are varying in their echogenicity. Deep to these structures, the muscle is found beneath a hyperechoic layer of fascia. Muscle is seen as highly organized hypoechoic and striated fibers.

Figure 1: Anatomy of normal skin

 

 

Tendons are visualized as hypoechoic fibrillar organized structures, whereas fat pads are also hypoechoic, but are more homogenous in their appearance (Figure 2). Finally, smooth hyperechoic bone cortex may be seen as the deepest layer.

Figure 2: Anatomy of a normal joint

 

Tip:

Scan with dual screen functionality

In order to facilitate comparing an affected joint with the contralateral side, it can be useful to use the dual screen function on the ultrasound machine.

1. Choose “More Controls” from the main screen, found at the bottom right corner (Figure 3a).Figure 3a: Choose “more controls”
2. Select “Dual” from the options screen (Figure 3b)Figure 3b: Choose “dual”
3. Touch the screen on either side to start scanning. When ready to switch, freeze the area of interest on the screen and then touch the opposite screen to begin scanning the opposite side (Figure 3c).Figure 3c: Toggle between screens by touching the desired side
4. Below is an example of a split screen view (Figure 3d).Figure 3d: Dual screen example

Indications

• Refusal to weight bear
• Limp
• Painful joint
• Swollen joint

 

Equipment

• Ultrasound machine
• Linear array probe (the curvilinear may be required for deep joins such as the hip in larger patients)
• Ultrasound gel

 

 

Introduction

Children often present to the emergency department with a limp, a painful joint, or refusal to weight bear. The differential is broad, including transient synovitis, septic arthritis and trauma. Previously, a formal ultrasound done by the radiology department has been used to determine the presence or absence of an effusion in order to help narrow the differential. PoCUS has been increasingly used by pediatric emergency physicians to quickly assess for the presence of a joint effusion at the bedside. The rapid identification of an effusion can expedite necessary interventions, including consultation of subspecialists or arranging for arthrocentesis.

 

Why Ultrasound?

Currently, most children presenting with a limp, refusal to weight bear or joint pain and swelling receive some combination of x-ray, blood work and formal ultrasound in the radiology department. Ultrasound as an imaging modality has many advantages, including low cost and no radiation [1,2]. The use of ultrasound at the bedside provides many advantages in its ease of access, as well as speed and portability [1-2]. This is especially useful when children are presenting to the department outside the hours in which a formal ultrasound is readily available.

Physical examination for joint effusions can be limited by pain, patient cooperation or soft tissue changes. POCUS is superior to physical exam for the detection of effusions and can be used to differentiate swelling at a joint due to effusion and soft tissue change (e.g. cellulitis) [3]. From an imaging perspective, X-ray has been shown to have a sensitivity for identifying an effusion ranging between 20-28%, whereas the sensitivity of a formal ultrasound approaches 100% [4-5]. Many studies have shown that PoCUS can been used by emergency physicians to easily identify fluid or a joint effusion in the hip, knee and ankle [1,5,6,7]. For example, a study in 2010 comparing trained PEM physicians performing hip ultrasound to a formal ultrasound read by radiologists showed a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 98%. Moreover, when the physician reported confidence in their exam, the specificity and positive predictive value improved to 100% [7]. In 2018 Cruz et al showed that PEM physicians were able to detect hip joint effusions with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 98% [2]. In 2010 Adhikari and Blavais examined the role of PoCUS in patients presenting with joint complaints. In patients with clinically suspected effusions in whom arthrocentesis was planned, management changed in 69.2% after PoCUS was performed. In those in whom arthrocentesis was not planned, management changed in 53.3% of cases after PoCUS was performed [8]. Clinically, the absence of a joint effusion can effectively rule out septic arthritis, which can prevent unnecessary interventions on patients.

Overall, the use of POCUS to identify joint effusions is safe, easy to perform, and a quick way to begin the work up for the child presenting to the emergency department with a limp.

Summary

Bedside ultrasound is useful for diagnosing and managing many skin soft tissue conditions. It can help distinguish cellulitis from abscess more reliably than clinical exam alone as well as guide drainage. It also helps to identify and locate foreign bodies. In addition to adding diagnostic value, bedside ultrasound has also been shown to decrease length of stay in the emergency department, increase patient perception of emergency physician skill, and improve patient satisfaction with ED care. Mastering skin and soft tissue sonography will improve your clinical skills and enhance the care you provide to you patients.

 

References

1. Thamburaj R, Sivitz A. Does the use of bedside pelvic ultrasound decrease length of stay in the emergency department? Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):67-70. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31827b53f9. PubMed PMID: 23283267.
2. Howard ZD, Noble VE, Marill KA, Sajed D, Rodrigues M, Bertuzzi B, Liteplo AS. Bedside ultrasound maximizes patient satisfaction. J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.05.044. Epub 2013 Aug 12. PubMedPMID: 23942153.
3. Ramirez-Schrempp D, Dorfman DH, Baker WE, Liteplo AS. Ultrasound soft-tissue applications in the pediatric emergency department: to drain or not to drain? Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Jan;25(1):44-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318191d963. Review. PubMed PMID: 19148015.
4. Squire BT, Fox JC, Anderson C. ABSCESS: applied bedside sonography for convenient evaluation of superficial soft tissue infections. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;12(7):601-6. PubMed PMID: 15995090.
5. Subramaniam S, Bober J, Chao J, Zehtabchi S. Point-of-care Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Abscess in Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;23(11):1298-1306. doi: 10.1111/acem.13049. Epub 2016 Nov 1. Review. PubMed PMID: 27770490.
6. Marin et al. Emergency Ultrasound-assisted Examination of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 20:545-53. doi: 10.1111/acem.12148
7. Iverson et al. The effect of bedside ultrasound on diagnosis and management of soft tissue infections in a pediatric ED. Am J of Emerg Med. 2012; 30: 1347-51. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2011.09.020.
8. Tayal VS, Hasan N, Norton HJ, Tomaszewski CA. The effect of soft-tissue ultrasound on the management of cellulitis in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Apr;13(4):384-8. Epub 2006 Mar 10. PubMed PMID: 16531602.
9. Sivitz et al. Effect of Bedside Ultrasound on Management of Pediatric Soft Tissue Infection. J of Emerg Med. 2010; 39(5): 637-43. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.05.013.
10. Yen ZS, Wang HP, Ma HM, Chen SC, Chen WJ. Ultrasonographic screening of clinically-suspected necrotizing fasciitis. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Dec;9(12):1448-51. PubMed PMID: 12460854.
11. Jacobson JA, Powell A, Craig JG, Bouffard JA, van Holsbeeck MT. Wooden foreign bodies in soft tissue: detection at US. Radiology. 1998 Jan;206(1):45-8. PubMed PMID: 9423650.9.     Davis J, Czerniski B, Au A, Adhikari S, Farrell I, Fields JM. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Retained Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;22(7):777-87. doi: 10.1111/acem.12714. Epub 2015 Jun 25. Review. PubMed PMID: 26111545.
12. Fabiszewska, E., Pasicz, K., Grabska, I., Skrzyński, W., Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk, W., & Bulski, W. (2017). Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing. Polish journal of radiology, 82, 773-782. doi:10.12659/PJR.904135
13. Lee MC, Rios AM, Aten MF, Mejias A, Cavuoti D, McCracken GH Jr, Hardy RD. Management and outcome of children with skin and soft tissue abscesses caused by community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004 Feb;23(2):123-7. PubMed PMID: 14872177.
14. Tayal VS, Hasan N, Norton HJ, Tomaszewski CA. The effect of soft-tissue ultrasound on the management of cellulitis in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Apr;13(4):384-8. Epub 2006 Mar 10. PubMed PMID: 16531602.
15. Barbaric D et al. In patients presenting to the emergency department with skin and soft tissue infections what is the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of abscess compared to the current standard of care? A systematic review and meta-analysis. 2017. BMJ Open. Jan 10;7(1):e013688.
16. Dean AJ et al. Techniquefor emergency medicine bedside ultrasound identification of a radiolucent foreign body. 2003. J Emerg Med. Apr;24(3):303-8.
17. Gaspari RJ and Sanseverino A. Ultrasound-Guided Drainage for Pediatric Soft Tissue. 2018. J Ultrasound Med. Jan;37(1):131-136.
18. Lin MJ et al. Point-of-Care Ultrasound is Associated With Decreased Length of Stay in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department With Soft Tissue Infection. 2018. J Emerg Med. Jan;54(1):96-101
19. Mallin M and Dawson M. “Introduction to Bedside Ultrasound: Volume 2.” Emergency Ultrasound Solutions, 2013. iBooks. https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/introduction-to-bedside-ultrasound-volume-2/id647356692?mt=11
20. Nienaber A et al. Accuracyof bedside ultrasound for the detection of soft tissue foreign bodies by emergency doctors. Emerg Med Australas. 2010 Feb;22(1):30-4.

 

Note: Videos and images thanks to Amanda Toney at Denver Health, Jon Orsborn at Children’s Hospital Colorado and personal images of the author Julia Brant from Children’s Hospital Co.