Introduction

Introduction

Hydronephrosis is a common finding in pediatric practice and can result from a variety of underlying causes. Timely assessment and monitoring are essential for effective management.

Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is an efficient way to screen the kidneys and bladder for major pathology. It is non-invasive and can be completed within minutes. Further, POCUS can be performed at the bedside and can be easily repeated to gauge the progression of pathology or the impact of interventions.

 

Why Ultrasound?

Patients often present to care with a variety of urological complaints from pain on voiding, urinary retention, flank pain and hematuria. In certain pediatric cases the symptoms might be vague or often have isolated fever without source initially. In cases of suspected urinary tract infection or obstruction, POCUS to evaluate for hydronephrosis in conjunction with relevant history can alert the physician to obtain further investigations.

Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) is the current standard for evaluation of suspected renal colic given its high sensitivity of 97% to 98% and high specificity of 96% to 100% [1]. However, the greater lifetime risk of radiation-induced cancer from CT, combined with the relatively low prevalence of renal colic in the pediatric population, suggests that ultrasound should be the initial test of choice [2]. Additionally, renal colic is often recurrent, with one study showing 67% of pediatric patients with nephrolithiasis having two or more renal colic episodes in a 5-year span [3]. Given the frequent need for diagnostic imaging in such patients, it is reasonable to consider ultrasound as a first line diagnostic test, considering its high sensitivity and specificity. In a pediatric population, the sensitivity and the specificity of renal POCUS are 76.5% and 97.2% respectively [4]. Additionally, POCUS enables earlier diagnosis and faster treatment of renal colic [5].

 

A landmark study published in 2014 by the New England Journal of Medicine conducted at 15 emergency departments compared the accuracy of POCUS and CT scans as the initial imaging method for patients with suspected kidney stones [6]. The authors found that there was no significant difference between POCUS and CT scans with regards to the following:

    • Diagnostic accuracy, recurrent emergency department visits or hospitalizations.
    • Incidence of high-risk diagnoses with complications, serious adverse events and average pain score.

The POCUS group, however, had a significantly lower dose of cumulative radiation exposure compared to the CT group. This NEJM study concluded that POCUS should be the first screening tool for patients with suspected kidney stones [6]. It is important to keep in mind that ultrasound is less sensitive than CT in identifying urolithiasis, especially ureteric stones and smaller stones [7].

 

While comprehensive ultrasounds performed by radiologists can evaluate the entire urinary tract for obstruction and, if visualized, can estimate stone size, it is technically quite challenging and optimal imaging conditions are difficult to obtain at the bedside. As such, our goal with renal POCUS is not to identify stones, but rather to detect hydronephrosis – an important consequence of obstructive uropathy. The cutoff size for a significant kidney stone is around 5mm. Stones <5mm have a significantly higher chance (81-98%) of spontaneously passing while stones >5mm will have an exponentially lower chance (9-65%) of spontaneously passing [8]. While not 100% specific, there is evidence that patients with no or mild hydronephrosis on ultrasound are significantly more likely to have ureteral stones <5 mm and will likely pass them without the need for surgical intervention [9].

KidSONO: Hydronephrosis

 

 

Author: Dr. Tanya Solano, M.D., FRCPC
Secondary Author: Dr. Juan Carlos Valerio, M.D., Msc.
Reviewer(s): Melanie Willimann, M.D., FRCPC ; Jackie Harrison, M.D., FRCPC; Julia Stiz, MSc., RDMS, Mark Bromley M.D., FRCPC.

 

*To continue through to the course, make sure to select the “Mark as Completed” button below.

 

By selecting the “Mark as Complete” button below, I acknowledge that:

  • This activity is educational only.
  • Completion does not grant certification, credentialing, privileging, or independent authorization to perform point-of-care ultrasound.
  • I am responsible for practicing within my professional scope, training, local institutional policies, supervision requirements, and regulatory requirements.
  • I will not rely on point-of-care ultrasound findings in isolation when making clinical decisions.
  • Any clinical use of point-of-care ultrasound remains subject to local governance, quality assurance, documentation, and patient safety processes.

References

 

**To unlock access to the first quiz, make sure to select the “Mark as Completed” button below

References

  1. Sullivan R, Baston CM. When Not to Trust the Bladder Scanner. The Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Estimate Urinary Bladder Volume. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Dec;16(12):1582–4.
  2. Taus PJ, Manivannan S, Dancel R. Bedside Assessment of the Kidneys and Bladder Using Point of Care Ultrasound. POCUS J. 2022 Feb 1;7(Kidney):94–104.
  3. Dessie A, Steele D, Liu AR, Amanullah S, Constantine E. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Assessment of Bladder Fullness for Female Patients Awaiting Radiology-Performed Transabdominal Pelvic Ultrasound in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2018;72(5):571-580. doi:1016/j.annemergmed.2018.04.010
  4. O’Brian RA, Firan A, Sheridan MJ, Kou M, Place RC, Chung CH. Bladder Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Time Saver in the Pediatric Emergency Department. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2021;61(3):e32-e39. doi:1016/j.jemermed.2021.04.010
  5. Ho-Gotshall S, Wilson C, Jacks E, Kashyap R. Handheld Ultrasound Bladder Volume Assessment Compared to Standard Technique. Cureus [Internet]. 2024 Jul 16 [cited 2025 Apr 10]; Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/180394-handheld-ultrasound-bladder-volume-assessment-compared-to-standard-technique
  6. Medical Advisory Secretariat. Portable bladder ultrasound: an evidence-based analysis. OntarioHealth TechnologyAssessmentSeries 2006; 6(11)
  7. Akca Caglar A, Tekeli A, Karacan CD, Tuygun N. Point-of-Care Ultrasound-Guided Versus Conventional Bladder Catheterization for Urine Sampling in Children Aged 0 to 24 Months. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Aug;37(8):413–6.
  8. Chen L, Hsiao AL, Moore CL, Dziura JD, Santucci KA. Utility of Bedside Bladder Ultrasound Before Urethral Catheterization in Young Children. Pediatrics. 2005 Jan 1;115(1):108–11.
  9. Marzuillo P, Guarino S, Capalbo D, et al. Interrater reliability of bladder ultrasound measurements in children. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2020;16(2):219.e1-219.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.12.015
  10. Ma J, Mateer J. Ma and Mateer’s Emergency Ultrasound. 4e ed. USA: McGraw Hill; 2021
  11. Jade Deschamps, Vi Dinh. Bladder Ultrasound Made Easy: Step-By-Step Guide [Internet]. POCUS 101. Available from: https://www.pocus101.com/bladder-ultrasound-made-easy-step-by-step-guide/
  12. Lim LY, Chang SJ, Yang SSD. Age- and gender-specific normal post void residual urine volume in healthy adolescents. J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Aug;19(4):367.e1-367.e6.
  13. Chang S, Chiang I, Hsieh C, Lin C, Yang SS. Age‐ and gender‐specific nomograms for single and dual post‐void residual urine in healthy children. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Sep;32(7):1014–8.
  14. Chang SJ, Yang SSD. Variability, Related Factors and Normal Reference Value of Post-Void Residual Urine in Healthy Kindergarteners. J Urol. 2009;182(4S):1933-1938. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.086