References

References

  1. Volpicelli et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med (2012) 38:577–591 doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2513-4
  2. Dietrich et al. Lung B-line atrefacts and their use. J Thorac Dis (2016) doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.55
  3. Mohamed et al. Frequency of Abnormalities Detected by Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Symptomatic COVID-19 Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 103(2), 2020, pp. 815–821 doi:10.4269/ajtmh.20-0371
  4. Al Deeb et al. Point of Care Ultrasonography for Diagnosis of Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema in Patiehs Presenting With Acute Dyspnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acad Em Med (2014) doi: 10.1111/acem.12435
  5. Rihal CS, Davis KB. Ward Kennedy J, Gersh BJ. The utility of clinical, electrocardiographic, and roentgenographic variables in the prediction of left ventricularfunction. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:220–3.
  6. Fonseca C, Mota T, Morais H, et al. The value of the electrocardiogram and chest X-ray for confirming or refuting a suspected diagnosis of heart failure in the community. Eur J Heart Fail 2004;6:807–12.
  7. Knudsen CW, Omland T, Clopton P, et al. Diagnostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide and chest radiographic findings in patients with acute dyspnea. Am J Med 2004;116:363–8.
  8. Martingale, Noble and Liteplo. Diagnosing Pulmonary Edema: lung ultrasound versus chest radiography. EJEM (2013) DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32835c2b88
  9. Volpicelli et al. Bedside lung ultrasound in the assessment of the alveolar-interstitial syndrome. AJEM (2016) doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2006.02.013
  10. Jones BP, Tay ET, Elikashvili I, Sanders JE, Paul AZ, Nelson BP, Spina LA, Tsung JW, Feasibility and Safety of Substituting Lung Ultrasound for Chest X-ray When Diagnosing Pneumonia in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial, CHEST (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.643
  11. Volpicelli et al. Lung ultrasound in diagnosing and monitoring pulmonary interstitial fluid. Radiol Med (2011) DOI 10.1007/s11547-012-0852-4

References

References

  1. Guevarra K, Greenstein Y. Ultrasonography in the Critical Care Unit. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020;22(11):145. doi:10.1007/s11886-020-01393-z  
  2. Volpicelli G, Lamorte A, Tullio M, et al. Point-of-care multiorgan ultrasonography for the evaluation of undifferentiated hypotension in the emergency department. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(7):1290-1298. doi:10.1007/s00134-013-2919-7  
  3. Potter SK, Griksaitis MJ. The role of point-of-care ultrasound in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: emerging evidence for its use. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(19):507-507. doi:10.21037/atm.2019.07.76  
  4. Mojoli F, Bouhemad B, Mongodi S, Lichtenstein D. Lung Ultrasound for Critically Ill Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(6):701-714. doi:10.1164/rccm.201802-0236CI  
  5. Griffee MJ, Merkel MJ, Wei KS. The role of echocardiography in hemodynamic assessment of septic shock. Crit Care Clin. 2010;26(2):365-382, table of contents. doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2010.01.001  
  6. Watkins LA, Dial SP, Koenig SJ, Kurepa DN, Mayo PH. The Utility of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. J Intensive Care Med. Published online October 9, 2021:088506662110478. doi:10.1177/08850666211047824  
  7. Gaspar HA, Morhy SS. The Role of Focused Echocardiography in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Critical Appraisal. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:1-7. doi:10.1155/2015/596451 de Boode WP, van der Lee R, et al. The role of Neonatologist Performed Echocardiography in the assessment and management of neonatal shock. Pediatr Res. 2018;84(S1):57-67. doi:10.1038/s41390-018-0081-1  
  8. Arnoldi S, Glau CL, Walker SB, et al. Integrating Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Into Pediatric Septic Shock Assessment*. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2021;22(3):262-274. doi:10.1097/PCC.0000000000002658  
  9. Ranjit S, Aram G, Kissoon N, et al. Multimodal Monitoring for Hemodynamic Categorization and Management of Pediatric Septic Shock: A Pilot Observational Study*. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2014;15(1):e17-e26. doi:10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182a5589c  
  10. Lichtenstein DA. BLUE-protocol and FALLS-protocol: two applications of lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Chest. 2015;147(6):1659-1670. doi:10.1378/chest.14-1313  
  11. Scalea TM, Rodriguez A, Chiu WC, et al. Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST): results from an international consensus conference. J Trauma. 1999;46:466–472  
  12. Kirkpatrick AW, Sirois M, Laupland KB, et al. Hand-held thoracic sonography for detecting post-traumatic pneumothoraces: the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST). J Trauma. 2004;57(2):288-295.   
  13. Miller A, Peck M, Clark T, et al. FUSIC HD. Comprehensive haemodynamic assessment with ultrasound. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. Published online April 23, 2021:17511437211010032. doi:10.1177/17511437211010032  
  14. McLean AS. Echocardiography in shock management. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):275. doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1401-7  
  15. Levitov A, Frankel HL, Blaivas M, et al. Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Bedside General and Cardiac Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Critically Ill Patients-Part II: Cardiac Ultrasonography. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(6):1206-1227. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001847  
  16. Singh Y, Tissot C, Fraga MV, et al. International evidence-based guidelines on Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). Crit Care. 2020;24(1):65. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-2787-9  
  17. Porter TR, Shillcutt SK, Adams MS, et al. Guidelines for the use of echocardiography as a monitor for therapeutic intervention in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):40-56. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2014.09.009  
  18. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(12):1795-1815. doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3525 

 

References

References

  1. Kerrey BT, Rinderknecht AS, Geis GL, Nigrovic LE, Mittiga MR. Rapid sequence intubation for pediatric emergency patients: higher frequency of failed attempts and adverse effects found by video review. Ann Emerg Med 2012;60(3):251-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.02.013.  
  2. Takeda T, Tanigawa K, Tanaka H, Hayashi Y, Goto E, Tanaka K. The assessment of three methods to verify tracheal tube placement in the emergency setting. Resuscitation 2003;56(2):153-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00345-3.  
  3. Kelly JJ, Eynon CA, Kaplan JL, de Garavilla L, Dalsey WC. Use of tube condensation as an indicator of endotracheal tube placement. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31(5):575-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70204-5.  
  4. Panchal AR, Berg KM, Hirsch KG, et al. 2019 American Heart Association Focused Update on Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: Use of Advanced Airways, Vasopressors, and Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Cardiac Arrest: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2019;140(24):e881-e894. (In eng). DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000732.  
  5. Kleinman ME, de Caen AR, Chameides L, et al. Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 2010;122(16 Suppl 2):S466-515. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971093.  
  6. Li J. Capnography alone is imperfect for endotracheal tube placement confirmation during emergency intubation. J Emerg Med 2001;20(3):223-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0736-4679(00)00318-8.  
  7. Brown CA, 3rd, Bair AE, Pallin DJ, Walls RM, Investigators NI. Techniques, success, and adverse events of emergency department adult intubations. Ann Emerg Med 2015;65(4):363-370 e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.036.  
  8. Chou HC, Chong KM, Sim SS, et al. Real-time tracheal ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2013;84(12):1708-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.06.018.  
  9. Ariff S, Ali KQ, Tessaro MO, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound compared to standard-of-care methods for endotracheal tube placement in neonates. Pediatr Pulmonol 2022;57(7):1744-1750. (In eng). DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25955.  
  10. Salem MR. Verification of endotracheal tube position. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 2001;19(4):813-39. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8537(01)80012-2.  
  11. Li X, Zhang J, Karunakaran M, Hariharan VS. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for the confirmation of endotracheal tube intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Ultrason 2023;25(1):72-81. DOI: 10.11152/mu-3594.  
  12. Gottlieb M, Bailitz JM, Christian E, et al. Accuracy of a novel ultrasound technique for confirmation of endotracheal intubation by expert and novice emergency physicians. West J Emerg Med 2014;15(7):834-9. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.22550.9.22550.  
  13. Chou HC, Tseng WP, Wang CH, et al. Tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) for confirming endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation. Resuscitation 2011;82(10):1279-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.016.  
  14. Chenkin J, McCartney CJ, Jelic T, Romano M, Heslop C, Bandiera G. Defining the learning curve of point-of-care ultrasound for confirming endotracheal tube placement by emergency physicians. Crit Ultrasound J 2015;7(1):14. DOI: 10.1186/s13089-015-0031-7.  
  15. Adi O, Chuan TW, Rishya M. A feasibility study on bedside upper airway ultrasonography compared to waveform capnography for verifying endotracheal tube location after intubation. Crit Ultrasound J 2013;5(1):7. DOI: 10.1186/2036-7902-5-7.  
  16. Walsh B, Fennessy P, Ni Mhuircheartaigh R, Snow A, McCarthy KF, McCaul CL. Accuracy of ultrasound in measurement of the pediatric cricothyroid membrane. Paediatr Anaesth 2019;29(7):744-752. DOI: 10.1111/pan.13658.  
  17. Fennessy P, Walsh B, Laffey JG, McCarthy KF, McCaul CL. Accuracy of pediatric cricothyroid membrane identification by digital palpation and implications for emergency front of neck access. Paediatr Anaesth 2020;30(1):69-77. DOI: 10.1111/pan.13773.  
  18. Siddiqui N, Arzola C, Friedman Z, Guerina L, You-Ten KE. Ultrasound Improves Cricothyrotomy Success in Cadavers with Poorly Defined Neck Anatomy: A Randomized Control Trial. Anesthesiology 2015;123(5):1033-41. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000848.  
  19. Lin J, Bellinger R, Shedd A, et al. Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Airway Evaluation and Management: A Comprehensive Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13(9). DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13091541.  
  20. Yildiz G, Goksu E, Senfer A, Kaplan A. Comparison of ultrasonography and surface landmarks in detecting the localization for cricothyroidotomy. Am J Emerg Med 2016;34(2):254-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.054.  
  1. Abbasi S, Farsi D, Zare MA, Hajimohammadi M, Rezai M, Hafezimoghadam P. Direct ultrasound methods: a confirmatory technique for proper endotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 2015;22(1):10-6. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000108.  
  2. Weaver B, Lyon M, Blaivas M. Confirmation of endotracheal tube placement after intubation using the ultrasound sliding lung sign. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13(3):239-44. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.014. 

References

  1. Sargent MA, Babyn PS, Alton DJ. Plain abdominal radiography in suspected intussusception: a reassessment. Pediatr Radiol. 1994;24(1):17–20 
  2. Tsou PY, Wang YH, Ma YK, et al. Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound and radiology-performed ultrasound for intussusception: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 2019 Sep;37(9):1760-9.  
  3. Riera A, Hsiao AL, Langhan ML, et al. Diagnosis of intussusception by physician novice sonographers in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2012;60(3):264-8.  
  4. Arroyo AC, Zerzan J, Vazquez H, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-Of-Care Ultrasound for Intussusception Performed by Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians. J Emerg Med 2021 Jan 19:S0736-4679(20)31330-5. 
  5. Kim JH, Lee JY, Kwon JH, et al. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Could Streamline the Emergency Department Workflow of Clinically Suspicious Nonspecific Intussusception. Pediatr Emerg Care 2020 Feb;36(2):e90-95. 
  6. Sharma P, Al-Sani F, Saini S, et al. Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Pediatric Diagnostic Dilemmas: Two Atypical Presentations of Intussusception. Pediatr Emerg Care 2019 Jan;35(1):72-4. 
  7. Doniger SJ, Salmon M, Lewiss RE. Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for the Rapid Diagnosis of Intussusception: A Case Series. Pediatr Emerg Care 2016 May;32(5):340-2. 

Summary

Summary

  • Intussusception should be considered in young children with abdominal pain, particularly when clinical signs are non-specific or vague. 
  • Ultrasound has excellent diagnostic accuracy for intussusception and POCUS was not significantly different from radiology-performed ultrasound. It is a good “rule in” test in the ED. 
  • The “Inverted U” technique provides a systematic approach to scanning the abdomen and increases the likelihood of identifying ileocolic intussusception. 
  • Always confirm abnormal findings in two planes, measure transverse diameter, and use color Doppler to assess perfusion. 
  • Key ultrasound findings of intussusception: 

“Target” or “doughnut” sign (>2.5–3 cm in diameter for ileocolic) — Transverse view

 “Pseudokidney” or “sandwich” appearance  — Longitudinal view

  • Normal bowel differentiation: 

Small bowel: smaller calibre, fluid-filled, peristalsis present 

Large bowel: larger calibre, gas/stool-filled, haustral folds, minimal peristalsis 

  • Early identification and expedited management of intussusception via POCUS can reduce ED length of stay and improve outcomes. 

Pitfalls and Limitations

 

It is important to visualize an intussusception in both planes to reduce the likelihood of mistaking it for thickened bowel loops, psoas muscle, stool, or other abdominal masses (Figure 11).

Small bowel intussusceptions can often be seen in the abdomen and in most cases are transient and do not require treatment. Small bowel intussusceptions can be differentiated by assessing for size (generally less than 2cm in diameter) and for the presence of peristalsis (absent in ileocolic intussusceptions) (Video 4).

Pathologic lead points may not be easily recognized with POCUS, therefore consider other imaging modalities when patients are outside the typical age range or with suggestive history or physical examination findings.

Ileocolic intussusception may self-reduce, therefore a positive POCUS examination with a subsequent negative radiologist-performed ultrasound is possible. 

 

Figure 11: Inflamed, thickened bowel, not to be mistaken for intussusception 

 

Video 4: Small bowel intussusception with the presence of peristalsis 

What is NOT normal?

What is NOT Normal?

 

Intussusception will appear differently due to the loss of air from the telescoped bowel. As a result, you are more easily able to visualize the intussusception compared to normal bowel. In the transverse view an intussusception appears as a “target” or “doughnut,” which is created by a hyperdense centre surrounded by multiple concentric hyperdense rings (Figure 6,8). This should have a minimum diameter of 2.5-3 cm with ileocolic intussusception. A “target” with a diameter of 2 cm or less suggests a small bowel intussusception, which generally self-resolve, and rarely require reduction. Intussusception appears as a “pseudokidney” or “sandwich” in the oblique or longitudinal view because of the multiple hypoechoic layers (Figure 10). 

 The diameter of intussusceptions are typically estimated visually or “eye-balled.” However,  if there is any uncertainty, callipers can be used to measure the anterior-posterior (AP) diameter from outer edge to outer edge in the transverse plane

In the case of a true ileocolic intussusception other findings can often be noted on ultrasound including small amounts of free fluid outside the intestine in the area of the intussusception as well as a small bowel obstruction. These findings are outside of the scope of this module and are discussed in the small bowel obstruction module. 

 

Figure 6: Transverse image intussusception—Target or Doughnut sign 

 

Figure 7: Transverse image intussusception, telescoping of the intussusceptum into the intussuscepiens 

 

Figure 8: Transverse image intussusceptionTarget or Doughnut sign 

 

Figure 9: Transverse image intussusception, telescoping of the intussusceptum into the intussuscepiens 

 

Figure 10: Intussusceptionpseudokidney” or “sandwich” in the oblique or longitudinal view 

 

 

Video 3: Normal bowel transitioning into Intussusception 

 

What is Normal?

Ultrasound anatomy: What is normal? 

 

First it is important to identify the cecum in the right lower quadrant as the beginning of the large bowel. To identify the cecum first place the probe in the RLQ and identify the psoas muscle and iliac vessels in cross section [Figure 4]. Lateral to the psoas muscle the cecum can be identified as a gas or stool filled structure [figure 5]. 

 

 

Figure 4: Transverse image of the RLQ, showing the iliac vessels in cross section and psoas muscle 

 

Figure 5: Transverse image of the RLQ demonstrating a gas-filled cecum with posterior shadowing, positioned lateral to the psoas muscle. 

 

Video 1: Transverse scan through the RLQ, displaying the gas filled cecum laterally and normal appearance of the terminal ileum with a smaller luminal caliber. 

 

On ultrasound, distinguishing between small and large bowel can sometimes be challenging. Typically, small bowel appears as having a smaller luminal caliber, contains fluid contents within, and demonstrates active peristalsis. Whereas large bowel has a larger calibre, is typically filled with gas or air and stool, has haustral folds and lacks peristalsis (Video 2).  

Video 2: Normal large bowel, displaying haustral folds and lack of peristalsis 

 

What am I Looking at?

 

Intussusception occurs when one part of the bowel telescopes into another part of the bowel [figure 2].  

Figure 2: An intussusception occurs when one part of the bowel telescopes into another 

 

While intussusception can happen at any location along the bowel, ileocolic intussusception is the most common type of intussusception occurring in children requiring timely intervention to resolve and the focus of this module. This occurs where the ileum and cecum connect [figure 3].  

Figure 3: Ileocolic intussusception is the most common intussusception in children and is the focus of this module. It occurs when the terminal ileum of the small bowel telescopes into the colon. 

 

To look for an ileocolic intussusception the exam begins in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen and follows the course of the large bowel.