Author: Robyn Buna
Secondary Author(s): Mark Bromley, Melanie Willimann
Reviewer(s): Nicholas Packer
**To continue through to the course, make sure to select the “Mark as Completed” button below, and at the end of each lesson page that follows.
**To continue through to the course, make sure to select the “Mark as Completed” button below, and at the end of each lesson page that follows.
Summary
Difficult IV access is a common issue faced in the pediatric patients and ultrasound guidance improves success and efficiency over the traditional land marking approaches. A dynamic approach is preferred, and the choice of out-of-plane vs in-plane technique is operator dependent. The ideal vessel for USG PIV placement is greater than 0.4cm in diameter, between 0.3 and 1.5cm in depth and at least 1cm in length. Long catheters are preferred to increase longevity.
Remember:
Pitfalls:
Immediate: unsuccessful attempts are most commonly due to puncturing the posterior wall and failing to visualize the needle tip as it enters the vessel. If care is not taken accidental injury to surrounding structures or inadvertent arterial cannulation is possible.
Late: Dislodgement is the most common cause of USG PIV failure as is often due to the placement of a short catheter in a deeper vein. It is recommended that A MINIMUM of 1 cm of catheter is left within the vessel after placement to prevent dislodgement by movement of the skin and soft tissues and ideally at least half of the catheter length is intraluminal. Given deeper vessels are often targeted in the US-guided technique compared to the landmark technique it is often beneficial to choose a longer catheter for placement.
Performing USG PIV Access
TIP: To focus on ideal targets, set the machine depth to its minimum setting.
Video 3: Out-of-plane technique (creep technique)
Video 4: In-plane technique
Technique
Techniques for USG PIV placement vary and can be adapted to best suit the user.
Techniques include:
Static vs Dynamic
In the static approach US is used solely to identify vessels and the overlying is marked. In a dynamic approach the US is used to guide the placement of the catheter into the vessel from skin puncture to cannulation. The static approach has significant limitations in terms of success due to movement of skin and subcutaneous tissues in relation to the underlying vessels. The dynamic use of US to guide needle placement is the preferred method in PIV access but can be more technically challenging to learn.
Single vs Dual Operator
USG PIV access can be performed with either single or dual operators – one person performs the ultrasound while the other performs the procedure. This provides the advantage of freeing up the proceduralist’s hands for IV placement alone. This technique also does not require the dual hand eye coordination of directing the ultrasound transducer as well as performing the procedure.
The dual operator technique is particularly useful in the situation where the operators have different skills sets, such as a nurse with good cannulation skills but limited US experience or a doctor who is comfortable identifying veins on US but lacks confidence in advancing and securing catheters. In such cases a dual operator approach may be preferred. Yet, with two operators, coordinating the ultrasound image relative to the needle can be technically challenging, so there is no preferred approach.
Out-of-plane vs in-plane
Finally, ultrasound guided procedures can be performed with either an out-of-plane or in-plane technique. Each has it advantages and drawbacks. The out-of-plane approach (figure 9) is generally preferred by novice users and has similar success rates compared to the in-plane approach, but special care must be taken to visualize the needle tip and avoid posterior wall puncture [14]. In pediatric patients a dynamic out-of-plane approach has been found to be successful and may be easier for novices [8,15].
Figure 9: Out-of-plane technique
The in-plane technique (figure 10) allows for visualization of the needle along its entire path and can reduce the risk of puncture of the posterior vessel wall, but it is a technically more challenging approach as keeping the vessel and needle in plane is difficult and the technique can be limited by vessel characteristics, operator experience, and patient movement.
Figure 10: In-plane technique
Equipment
Ultrasound equipment:
IV Equipment (figure 8)
Figure 8: Equipment for US-guided PIV access
Indications
Contraindications
As per standard PIV placement:
Risk Factors for Difficult PIV Access
Ultrasound anatomy: What Am I Looking At?
Being familiar with the anatomy and trajectory of the veins will aid in their US localization. Vessels are most easily identified in the transverse axis, providing a cross sectional view. They appear as round or oval anechoic (black) structures (figure 5). Following the vessel along its length with the ultrasound ensures it is patent, straight and free of valves and allows for estimation of trajectory to guide needle approach.
Figure 5: Ultrasound appearance of veins
Veins can be differentiated from arteries, which are also round anechoic structures by assessing their relative wall thickness, compressibility, pulsatility and continuous blood flow. Veins are relatively thin walled compared to arteries and are easily compressed when pressure is applied with the transducer—in fact if you are having a difficult time seeing any veins it is often that the superficial veins are being compressed by the probe—a light touch with a braced hand is best. In addition, when pressure is applied with the probe pulsatility of blood flow being transmitted within the vessel can be seen in arteries but not veins (video 1). Some veins near arteries can appear pulsatile due to transmitted movement so the final step in differentiating the two involves using color mode to assess for continuous flow in veins vs pulsatile flow in the arteries (video 2). Be aware that when a tourniquet is up veins often show no flow.
Video 1: Differentiating between veins and arteries on ultrasound: compression technique
Video 2: Differentiating between veins and arteries on ultrasound: color doppler technique
Many children requiring US-guided IV access will have already had multiple attempts, so it is also important to be able to identify a damaged vessel. Other than trying to avoid sites that are visibly bruised, damaged veins can also be identified on ultrasound. Damaged veins can have clot within the vessel which appears as echogenic material in the vessel lumen (figure 6). A clotted vessel is often not fully compressible as well. Other clues include a hematoma around the vessel which appears as a relatively hyperechoic collection next to or surrounding the vessel (figure 7). If you suspect a damaged vessel choose a section of vein proximal to the area or an alternate site.
Figures 6 & 7: US of damaged vessel with clot and surrounding hematoma
Veins best suited to US-guided catheter placement include those 0.3 to 1.5cm deep, 4mm in diameter with a straight course of at least 1cm in length [12]. Small or superficial veins can be more challenging to identify and cannulate via ultrasound but if successfully placed catheters in small veins have similar longevity to larger ones and those in superficial veins (less that 1.2 cm) have the best longevity and are less prone to dislodgement [12,13]. The relative location to surrounding structures such as arteries, nerves and tendons should also be considered, as they can be injured if in close proximity. It is best to choose a site which is furthest from such key structures.
Anatomy Review: Where Am I Looking?
The veins of the forearm and the saphenous are the primary targets for ultrasound guided peripheral venous access. An ideal site involves choosing a vein that in less than 1.5 cm deep, 4mm in diameter and at least 1 cm in length [12]. The vessels of the distal upper arm are also considerations in those with difficult access, although can be more challenging to cannulate due to surrounding structures and deeper location [12]. If canulating the vessels of the upper arm the cephalic vein is preferred for its superficial location and distance from other structures. The basilic vein of the upper arm is the preferred site for PICC placement and should be avoided. The brachial veins lie very deep and in proximity to arteries and nerves which make access challenging. When using the vessels of the upper arm, consider placing a mid-length catheter as dislodgement of short catheters is more common at these sites.
The cephalic vein begins at the anatomic snuff box and courses laterally along the forearm and upper arm, draining into the axillary vein (figures 1&2). The basilic vein drains the ulnar dorsal veins of the hand and courses medially up the forearm and upper arm, halfway up the forearm the basilic vein penetrates the brachial fascia and continues to run medial to the brachial artery (figures 1&2). Another site in the forearm includes the median antebrachial vein which courses the ventral aspect of the forearm between the cephalic and basilic veins before joining the basilic vein near the elbow (figures 1&2).
Figures 1&2: Upper extremity venous anatomy
The saphenous originates anterior to the medial malleolus and ascends the medial aspect of the leg (figures 3&4).
Figures 3&4: Lower extremity venous anatomy
Introduction
Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) is the use of portable ultrasonography to answer focused clinical questions or to guide procedures.
Peripheral intravenous (PIV) access is one of the most frequent and essential emergency and inpatient medical procedures. It allows for the timely administration of medications, intravenous fluids and the collection of blood samples. Despite being a high frequency procedure, PIV access is often challenging in children, resulting in multiple attempts and significant distress. Risk factors for difficult PIV placement include young age, history of prematurity, obesity, dehydration, critical illness, chronic illness, IV drug use, difficulty visualizing or palpating veins with a tourniquet and patient anxiety [1,2,3]. The difficult IV access score (DIVA) is externally validated to predict children likely to fail PIV access attempts and includes age, prematurity, and vein characteristics [4]. Difficulty in obtaining PIV access results in diagnostic and treatment delays, as well as increased patient discomfort, anxiety and stress. In this patient population, PoCUS allows for direct visualization of the vasculature and can facilitate access.
Why Ultrasound?
Traditionally, peripheral intravenous (PIV) access is performed blindly using a basic knowledge of human anatomy, surface landmarking, and palpation. Ultrasound allows for the visualization of veins that are not clinically apparent and guides placement through visualization of the catheter and the vein [5].
Studies show the use of ultrasound to guide PIV placement results in increased overall success rates [6]. Importantly, ultrasound use decreases the numbers of attempts and number of needle redirections required; this results in less pain and anxiety for the patient and results in a faster time to successfully obtain IV access [7]. In addition, ultrasound allows access to the larger vessels of the upper arm in the case of difficult access or preference for mid-length catheter placement. Ultrasound guided (USG) PIV access is an easily acquired skill. Following a one-hour course, emergency technicians showed significant improvements in speed, patient satisfaction, number of punctures and complications [8]. A study looking at the competency of emergency nurses trained on ultrasound guided PIV procedure for difficult access patients found an 88% success rate was achieved after 15-26 attempts [9].
These benefits are particularly salient in the pediatric setting where PIV access is inherently challenging and creates significant distress for patients and their caregivers. In one hospital setting where a USG PIV program was established, there was a 20% reduction in referral for PICC placements [10] and a recent randomized controlled trial found for every 3 UG PIVs one missed attempt was prevented [11]. Finally, the use of ultrasound guided PIV access has been endorsed by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality in the United States.